worldtimelines.org.uk
Asia > Western Asia 331-133 BC Hellenistic
Previous articlePrevious article||Next articleNext article
   Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates I
Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates ILarger image
Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates I
Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates I
Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates I
Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates I
Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates I
  Larger image
© 2006 The British Museum

171-138 BC
From Iran

Although the Parthians originated in the east they imitated the coinage of the earlier Seleucid rulers of Iran with Hellenistic-Greek designs. The profile portrait of Mithradates I shows him wearing a western-style diadem while the seated archer on the reverse (back) resembles the Greek god Apollo though he is dressed in Iranian fashion.

Weight: 15.4g; Diameter: 29 mm
The British Museum CM 1848,0803.22
Alexander's conquest of Persia
Alexander's conquest of Persia
Greek influence in Mesopotamia
Greek influence in Mesopotamia
The Parthians
The Parthians
The South Arabian incense trade
The South Arabian incense trade
The Parthians

In 238 BC a nomadic group called the Parni, originally from Central Asia and led by a man named Arsaces settled in the satrapy (administrative district) of Parthia in northern Iran. Known as the Parthians after their successful conquest of the land, they established a line of rulers who assumed the name Arsaces as a royal title. The Seleucid king Antiochus III (reigned 223-187 BC) reconquered much of Iran around 204 BC when he campaigned in the east. However, during the 2nd century BC the Parthians extended their power across Iran and Mesopotamia. Under Mithradates I (reigned 171-139 BC) and his successors, the Parthians grew into one of the dominant powers in the Near East. They gained control of the Seleucid capital, Seleucia-on-Tigris and founded their own capital of Ctesiphon on the opposite bank.

The River Euphrates formed the Parthian-Roman border, but Rome had ambitions of dominating the Near East. Parthia’s geographical position is popularly believed to mean that it benefited from controlling the trade along the so-called Silk Road between China and Rome, yet the economic importance of this route (actually a network of routes) has been over-emphasised.

Home | Index | Museums | Help | About | Contact Us | Access | Back to top
© 2005 The British Museum